corfere.blogg.se

1. #Mastercam vs solidworks update
2. #Mastercam vs solidworks manual
3. #Mastercam vs solidworks software
4. #Mastercam vs solidworks code

The company received Catia files and wanted to read them in with all the background information. If you would like to know more about our SOLIDWORKS integrated CAM package check out the link or video below.SolidCAM gets its foot in the door against MastercamĪt the end of 2015, we were able to gain a foothold with a long-established contract mold manufacturer, although the company has strong ties to Mastercam due to its proximity to the local Mastercam reseller. Obviously, some knowledge about machining is required but not at the level of which you would program manually.

#Mastercam vs solidworks software

Utilizing CAM software allows less experienced workers to program G code. This is a serious problem if you are programming by hand or your worker approaches retirement age. Those companies that have them do not let them go.

WorkforceĮxperienced programmers are like finding a needle in a haystack. This saves from having to scrap parts or spend additional time testing a program when we already know it’s going to work. These are all things that can verified before breaking any equipment. It also checks for crashes that you might have and even if the shoulder of a tool will contact the stock. Toolpath simulation in certain CAM packages allows you to verify that there will be no gouging of the part as well as make sure you are not leaving any excess material. CAM packages do not have the fat finger issues and also include functionality like toolpath simulation which will verify that the toolpath is correct.

#Mastercam vs solidworks code

There is no way to verify the code before running it on the machine. Just fat fingering a single number could ruin the entire part. When it comes to writing the G code line by line the amount of potential mistakes is very high. The more human input into anything the more potential for error. It also reduces the error involved with programming which brings me into my next point. CAM software makes this much easier and doesn’t require as much machining knowledge or skill.

The complexity of programming this by hand certainly takes much longer, and also requires calculations and verification. Whenever I meet someone who is programming 4 & 5 axis parts by hand I am completely amazed. This allows for the revision change to be a speed bump and not a roadblock.

#Mastercam vs solidworks update

CAM software can update the toolpaths with any changed features and make you focus on anything that may be new. Being able to change the program quickly is just not something that happens often with a new revision. Revision ChangeĪfter spending all that time writing G code and then the customer issues a revision, how demoralizing is that? You just hope that most of the program is salvageable. The time savings by transitioning to a CAM package allows your programmers to program more parts which usually leads to more jobs. The speed at which G code can be written by a CAM software compared to doing it manually is mind-blowing. Writing out G code line by line is so tedious and simply put, takes forever on a part with any complexity.

#Mastercam vs solidworks manual

Navy Petty Officer 3rd Class Jaime Keith, Naval Air Station Whidbey Island, Wash., programs the Haas Tool Room Mill to mill brackets for an EA-6B ProwlerĬredit: The 6 Biggest Reasons CAM Software Outperforms Manual Input Every Time 1.Programming Time Our customer proceeded to purchase our CAM solution due to this. Two hours vs two weeks, that is some easy ROI to justify. I had verified using the program simulation that there would be no crashes, gouging, or excess material. Within a couple of hours, I had the program to a point where I would be happy running it on the machine. This part had features that required 5 axis machining, so I went to work. They came to us knowing there must be a better option than doing it by hand. We will be discussing where manual CNC programming falls short of CAM software.įor example, our customer had a complex part they were machining that took them roughly two weeks to program. The typical response when we ask that question is “That’s just how we’ve always done it.” I fail to understand why companies are still programming by hand due to the limitations and problems associated with it. With so Many Advantages to Using CAM Software, Why do Some Still Program CNC by Hand?